>
> This doesn't look right: why 1 and not 0?


I copied this from my hanifi-rohingya composition rules, where I do not
remember
why I added 0 instead of 1. Even though they were working as intended I
have replaced it with 0
there just to be safe.

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 6:46 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
> >  <lumarzeli30@gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:52:22 +0530
> >
> > --- a/etc/NEWS
> > +++ b/etc/NEWS
> > @@ -1229,10 +1229,9 @@ to edit such sequences by allowing point to
> "enter" the sequence.
> >  *** Support for many old scripts and writing systems.
> >  Emacs now supports and has language-environments and input methods for
> >  several dozens of old scripts that were used in the past for various
> > -languages in South and South-East Asia.  For each such script Emacs
> > -now has font-selection and character composition rules, a language
> > -environment, and an input method.  The newly-added scripts and the
> > -corresponding language environments are:
> > +languages.  For each such script Emacs now has font-selection and
> character
> > +composition rules, a language environment, and an input method.  The
> newly-added
> > +scripts and the corresponding language environments are:
>
> The new text needs to be re-filled.
>
> > +;; Adlam composition rules
> > +(set-char-table-range
> > + composition-function-table
> > + '(#x1E900 . #x1E95F)
> > + (list (vector
> > +        "[\x1E900-\x1E95F]+"
> > +        1 'font-shape-gstring)))
>
> This doesn't look right: why 1 and not 0?
>