Er, wait, this won't handle nested alists, I'll fix it tomorrow. Chris ------ Original Message ------ From: "Chris Hecker" To: "Alan Mackenzie" ; "Philip Kaludercic" Cc: 57996@debbugs.gnu.org Sent: 2022-10-05 06:45:05 Subject: Re[4]: bug#57996: 28.2; imenu doesn't differentiate overloaded c++ functions > >Okay, I figured out a way to do this that works pretty easily, and the >same idea could be integrated into imenu fairly trivially: > >>(defun checker-imenu-make-unique-alist (index-alist) >> "De-duplicate the imenu alist by adding indices to duplicate names." >> (let ((h (make-hash-table :test #'equal))) >> (mapc (lambda (el) >> (let* ((k (car el)) >> (v (gethash k h))) >> (if v >> (let ((n (car v))) >> (if (= n 1) >> (setcar (car (cdr v)) (format "%s(1)" k))) >> (setq n (1+ n)) >> (puthash k '(n nil) h) >> (setcar el (format "%s(%d)" k n))) >> (puthash k (list 1 el) h)))) >> index-alist))) >>(advice-add 'imenu--truncate-items :filter-return >>#'checker-imenu-make-unique-alist) > >So this just hooks the imenu--truncate-items function because it was >the easiest function that was hookable on the pre-cached side of the >code (meaning it doesn't get called every imenu, just on *rescan*). It >puts the function names in a hash, and if they are dupes, it puts (n) >after the name. Works great. > >Chris > > > >------ Original Message ------ >From: "Chris Hecker" >To: "Alan Mackenzie" ; "Philip Kaludercic" > >Cc: 57996@debbugs.gnu.org >Sent: 2022-10-05 04:15:12 >Subject: Re[3]: bug#57996: 28.2; imenu doesn't differentiate overloaded >c++ functions > >> >>Hmm... >> >>item is selected by the user. This function is called with >>arguments consisting of the item name, the buffer position, and >>the ARGUMENTS. >> >>This looks like it might work... I just opened my .emacs and found >>I'd already hacked my own version of the c++ matching function, so >>maybe I'll try this. >> >>A few minutes later... >> >>Okay, so this function does indeed get called, but both Function >>elements in the imenu list pass the marker for the first Function, so >>that's unfortunate... I will look at that... >> >>Another few minutes... >> >>Well, it looks like imenu--generic-function generates the right alist >>with the two functions and the two different markers, so it's >>something about choosing in the buffer... >> >>Here's the alist return, looks good: >> >>(("Function" . #) >> ("Function" . #) >> ("Bar" . #)) >> >>I should sleep, but maybe there's just a bug in the code that selects >>the function, or it searches by name instead of by index. I wish >>there was some way for the regex match to return a mangled name...I'll >>look into imenu next. >> >>Chris >> >>------ Original Message ------ >>From: "Chris Hecker" >>To: "Alan Mackenzie" ; "Philip Kaludercic" >> >>Cc: 57996@debbugs.gnu.org >>Sent: 2022-10-05 03:47:06 >>Subject: Re[2]: bug#57996: 28.2; imenu doesn't differentiate >>overloaded c++ functions >> >>> >>>Yeah, I should probably switch to something a little more modern, but >>>imenu has the advantage of just being there and working most of the >>>time across all machines and shells and stuff. It definitely gets >>>confused occasionally (like it doesn't find inline functions in class >>>declarations) but this overload thing seemed like it might be a >>>simple fix. >>> >>> >>>The scanning interface to imenu allows just function names to be >>>collected. It doesn't allow anything extra (such as a line number) to >>>be included into the alist. >>> >>>I guess you could mangle the name to include the line number or match >>>number...kinda hacky but it'd work...maybe I'll take a look. >>> >>>Chris >>> >>> >>>------ Original Message ------ >>>From: "Alan Mackenzie" >>>To: "Philip Kaludercic" >>>Cc: "Chris Hecker" ; 57996@debbugs.gnu.org >>>Sent: 2022-10-05 03:31:11 >>>Subject: Re: bug#57996: 28.2; imenu doesn't differentiate overloaded >>>c++ functions >>> >>>>Hello, Chris and Philip. >>>> >>>>On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 13:13:16 +0000, Philip Kaludercic wrote: >>>>> "Chris Hecker" writes: >>>> >>>>> > With this dumb c++ file: >>>>> > ---- >>>>> > int Function( int n ) { >>>>> > return n; >>>>> > } >>>>> > int Function( float v ) { >>>>> > return (int)(v + 0.5); >>>>> > } >>>>> > ---- >>>> >>>>> > Hitting imenu only gives a single Function entry. It should probably >>>>> > give two, maybe with a line number after them like "Function(123)" or >>>>> > whatever. Currently there's no way to get to the second Function from >>>>> > imenu. >>>> >>>>imenu is old and rather simplistic. It parses a buffer, then stores the >>>>results in an association list. It then uses the function assoc on that >>>>list to get "the" match. What we could do with is a function which gets >>>>_all_ the matches from an alist, and I've asked on emacs-devel about >>>>this. >>>> >>>>> Note that this is not the case when using Eglot and a LSP server like >>>>> clangd. >>>> >>>>Much more modern! >>>> >>>>> I've CC'ed Alan to see if he knows how this could be done by c++-mode >>>>> itself. >>>> >>>>I'm pretty sure it couldn't be. I think it would involve enhancing >>>>imenu. The scanning interface to imenu allows just function names to be >>>>collected. It doesn't allow anything extra (such as a line number) to >>>>be included into the alist. >>>> >>>>I've looked at problems with imenu in C++ Mode before, but got bogged >>>>down without coming up with a workable solution. There the problem was >>>>identically named methods in different classes, or something like that. >>>> >>>>So, maybe we can enhance imenu. But not for Emacs 29. >>>> >>>>-- >>>>Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).