Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Akib Azmain Turja >> Cc: 57728@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 14:03:04 +0600 >> >> > Let me turn the table and ask you: why do you think that '\' is not >> > the usual continuation glyph that Emacs always produces when the width >> > of a screen line on a TTY frame is exceeded? >> > >> > >> > >> >> OK, OK. This title is misleading. Showing the continuation glyph is >> not wrong, but it is unexpected, because Emacs doesn't write to the >> bottom-right corner. > > I've seen these continuation glyphs on every TTY display where I ever > used Emacs, so I'd consider it a surprise, if not a bug, that on some > TTYs those continuation glyphs were absent. They should be there to > indicate to the user that the line is continued. > >> Perhaps I don't have the ability to express the problem in character, so >> I'm trying to pixel. Can you please spend some seven and half minutes >> to watch the bug in the video I attached? > > Sorry, I cannot want videos of this format. What format should I use? AFAIK, ogv is a free format. How about asciicast (made with asciinema)? -- Akib Azmain Turja Find me on Mastodon at @akib@hostux.social. This message is signed by me with my GnuPG key. Its fingerprint is: 7001 8CE5 819F 17A3 BBA6 66AF E74F 0EFA 922A E7F5