Ok I will do that, thanks!

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:55 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30@gmail.com>
> > Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 22:40:02 +0530
> > Cc: 55370@debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > Yes it was not correct, this seems more appropriate.
> >
> > ;; Syloti Nagri composition rules
> > (let ((consonant            "[\xA807-\xA80A\xA80C-\xA822]")
> >       (independent-vowel    "[\xA800\xA801\xA803-\xA805]")
> >       (vowel                "[\xA802\xA823-\xA827]")
> >       (nasal                "[\xA80B]")
> >       (virama               "[\xA806\xA82C]"))
> >   (set-char-table-range composition-function-table
> >                         '(#xA802 . #xA82C)
> >                         (list (vector
> >                                ;; Consonant conjunct based syllables
> >                                (concat independent-vowel "?" consonant
> "\\(?:" virama consonant "\\)+"
> >                                        vowel "?" nasal "?")
> >                                1 'font-shape-gstring))))
> >
> > btw this range does not cause emacs to slow down, right?
>
> It might, because the range is very large, and so any character in the
> range #xA802..#xA82C will cause Emacs to try to match the regexp.
>
> So if there's a way of having the rules on fewer characters, that
> would be better, even if there will be more rules.
>
> > also should I send separate patches for the syloti nagri, and the fix
> for previous scripts, or combine them into
> > one?
>
> You can combine them into a single patch, just make sure the log
> message mentions all the changes.
>
> Thanks.
>