Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Kévin Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> We could keep the call to (set-buffer) in run-python, but AFAICT it's
>> redundant for user interaction: pop-to-buffer selects the window, so
>> when the command loop returns to the user the *Python* buffer will be
>> made current anyway.
>>
>> Does this sound… sound?  If so, I'll submit a v2 amending
>> python-tests--bug31398.
>
> Sounds good to me.

Alright, here goes; after reviewing the original bug#31398 report, I
also took the liberty of adjusting the test name, commentary and
docstring.

It'd be great if the rationale bit of the commit message made it in 🙏