Hi, Andrew Tropin writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > On 2023-02-09 13:39, zimoun wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, 09 Feb 2023 at 14:11, Andrew Tropin wrote: >> >>> I applied tree-sitter and tree-sitter-cli patches, >> >> Just to be sure to understand, you have only applied 02/32 and 05/32, >> right? >> >> >> [bug#49946] [PATCH v7 02/32] gnu: tree-sitter: Update to 0.20.7. >> id:20221125012142.22579-3-pierre.langlois@gmx.com >> http://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/20221125012142.22579-3-pierre.langlois@gmx.com >> >> [bug#49946] [PATCH v7 05/32] gnu: Add tree-sitter-cli. >> id:20221125012142.22579-6-pierre.langlois@gmx.com >> http://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/20221125012142.22579-6-pierre.langlois@gmx.com >> >> Leaving out all the others, right? > > Merged first 5 patches from 01 to 05, also added one more commit, which > addresses some things from reviews and one commit, which adds html > grammar. I had also started rebasing addressing comments on the tree-sitter-cli package, and had a few extra changes left that haven't been pushed. I realised we could remove a now redundant comment, and while enabling *some* tests, I realized we should directly depend on node and dot, so that people may use the `tree-sitter' command, without needing them in the same profile. What do you think of the following two patches?