On 10/17/20 11:32 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > this is still nowhere near the compromise I suggested. > And it loses %S, something I didn't agree to. Attached is a revised patch that implements what you suggested, and it does not lose %S. Here is what you suggested in : > How about a compromise: we modify doprint to exit when either it finds > NUL or reaches the character specified by FORMAT_END? and the attached patch implements this proposed API change.