Thank you for the reviews, Oleg.  :)

Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust@gmail.com> writes:
> Joseph LaFreniere <joseph@lafreniere.xyz> writes:
>
>> Patch file is attached.  Similar to the first patch in this 
>> series, `guix
>> lint` reports "the source file name should contain the package 
>> name".
>
> Yes, because emacs-major-mode-hydra inherits emacs-pretty-hydra.

Fixed in the updated patch for emacs-pretty-hydra.

> Does emacs-major-mode-hydra is useful without emacs-pretty-hydra 
> and
> vice versa?
>
> I guess not, in that case we could just have emacs-pretty-hydra
> containing '*.el' for both.

Yes, emacs-pretty-hydra is useful independently of 
emacs-major-mode-hydra.  The descriptions in the initial patches 
were written a long time ago and were misleading.  I apologize for 
the confusion.

> Could you extend the synopsis little bit? ;-)

Missed this comment in the updated patch for emacs-pretty-hydra 
that I just sent.  I will revisit it following this mail.  Is the 
synopsis for this recipe (emacs-major-mode-hyra) suitable?

--
Joseph LaFreniere