Brice Waegeneire writes: > * gnu/services/base.scm (file-system-type->utilities, > file-system-utilities): New procedures. > (file-system-service-type): Extend 'profile-service-type' with > 'file-system-utilities'. > * gnu/system.scm (boot-file-system-service): New procedure... > (operating-system-default-essential-services): ...use it. > (%base-packages): Remove 'e2fsprogs'. > * gnu/system/file-systems.scm (file-system): Add 'utilities?' field. > --- > > Fix bcachefs typo and replace 'utils' by 'utilities'. Reword the > documentation procedures to be clearer. Remove (srfi srfi-2) and (ice-9 > regex) which weren't used since v1. > > gnu/services/base.scm | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > gnu/system.scm | 28 ++++++++++++++++---------- > gnu/system/file-systems.scm | 6 +++++- > 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) Thanks for the updated patch Brian, and apologies it's taken so long to review. I've had a quick look through, and generally it looks fine to me. > diff --git a/gnu/system/file-systems.scm b/gnu/system/file-systems.scm > index 3b599efa8e..f78c3b1b8e 100644 > --- a/gnu/system/file-systems.scm > +++ b/gnu/system/file-systems.scm > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > ;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU > ;;; Copyright © 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 Ludovic Courtès > +;;; Copyright © 2020 Brice Waegeneire > ;;; > ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix. > ;;; > @@ -42,6 +43,7 @@ > file-system-create-mount-point? > file-system-dependencies > file-system-location > + file-system-utilities? > > file-system-type-predicate > > @@ -111,7 +113,9 @@ > (default '())) ; or > (location file-system-location > (default (current-source-location)) > - (innate))) > + (innate)) > + (utilities? file-system-utilities? ; Boolean > + (default #t))) > > ;; A file system label for use in the 'device' field. > (define-record-type On utilties? here, I wonder if the name for this option could be clearer? Most of the other options can be interpreted in the context of the filesystem itself, but this is about whether the system profile should include utilities for that filesystem. I haven't got any particularly good ideas though, maybe system-include-utilities? I think utilities? is OK though, if someone wants to turn it off, then they'll probably be able to work out how. On that, maybe the only must before merging this is adding to the list of options in the documentation. Is this something you're able to do? Thanks, Chris