Kyle Meyer writes:

> This one points to a real problem, though you'd only see it when calling
> the command magit-annex-unused-log.  Magit renamed magit-git-log to
> magit-log-setup-buffer.  Magit-annex's master tracks Magit's, so it uses
> the new name, but the former is what is in the commit that Guix's Magit
> is built from.  I've pushed a compatibility kludge to Magit-annex so
> that it will fall back to the old name.
>
> Could you squash this commit into your commit?
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> index c56766047d..b4c12f57ea 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ (define-public emacs-magit-popup
>      (license license:gpl3+)))
>  
>  (define-public emacs-magit-annex
> -  (let ((commit "0bc96737634e78ac7c7f8a3f73190531c0890914")
> +  (let ((commit "ef5dce6267e9118a5eca82a22bcad0b67826c23a")
>          (revision "1"))
>      (package
>        (name "emacs-magit-annex")
> @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ (define-public emacs-magit-annex
>                  (file-name (git-file-name name version))
>                  (sha256
>                   (base32
> -                  "1lm8412n2046fz8n7rfbadyww2074lsxq0w4gm1x1alraz5im5h4"))))
> +                  "0vzkydgl889cq173zjl89g2vrddb9abc4a8gljiz3b4a7n5b1nrd"))))
>        (build-system emacs-build-system)
>        (propagated-inputs
>         `(("magit" ,emacs-magit)

Done.  The messages are gone, yay!

Is it good to push now then, I'd assume?

 - Chris

PS: I didn't realize you were a (the?) developer of the package I'm
submitting to Guix, and doing the review!  That's wonderful!