Ludovic Courtès writes: > Actually, what about performing this substitution as a phase > instead of > here? We could probably use ‘emacs-substitute-sexps’ to do > that, which > should be nicer, and we could also hard-code the absolute file > name of > ‘vterm-module.so’. Thank you for the feedback, Ludo. A new patch is attached. Both of the suggested changes (using emacs-substitute-sexps and hardcoding the absolute path of the shared object) have been implemented. Additionally, the shared object has been moved into /lib. -- Joseph LaFreniere