On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 19:06 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> We don't expect to make any further releases from the emacs-26
> branch, so backporting those changes would be pointless.
> 
> May I suggest that you continue using Emacs 27?  We added HarfBuzz
> support because we believe it is developed much more actively that
> m17n-db, and thus will generally produce better results in scripts
> that require complex shaping.

Okay. Will switch to emacs-27.

Thanks.
-- 
Joshua Immanuel
HiPro IT Solutions Private Limited
http://hipro.co.in