Janneke,

Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It's not a pure guile package...should it still be named 
> guile-emacsy,

Yes.

> WDYT?

Personally: that the language(s) the package is *written* in don't 
actually matter much.

What matters is whether it's a library *for* that language.

+       "Emacsy is an embeddable GNU Emacs-like library for GNU 
Guile.

…and it is :-)

Which is just, like, my opinion, of course,

T G-R