>>>> There is no need for the new option to be consistent across
>>>> both synchronous and async/remote operations.
>>>
>>> Call it `async-shell-command-width', that's it. Nobody has asked for the
>>> synchronous case.
>>
>> Yes, this is a safer option.
>
> Do you still plan to use that name? As said, I believe it is the better
> one. Nobody has opposed the last ten days.
>
> And, btw, this option still needs to be documented in the Emacs manual.

Do you agree with this change?