Michael Heerdegen writes: Hi Michael, > We also have `seq-some' which can be used as a contain predicate, > e.g. to fix this bug: Using seq-contains was wrong, and I think seq-some should have been used instead, so I like your patch better (it's IMO better to use seq-some used as a predicate than seq-position). Unless somebody disagrees, I'll install your patch. Cheers, Nico