Yes, I agree (with myself :-). I've just "cleaned the room" according to your instructions and I still see the desired behavior. So I guess this wraps up the issue. Thanks for all the help. João On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 4:03 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: João Távora > > Cc: 32986@debbugs.gnu.org > > Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 23:08:30 +0100 > > > > In other words, subprocess input is considered during a 'sit-for'. It > > doesn't end it, but that's OK if catch/throw is used. > > > > I'd just like to confirm that I'm not dealing with an "dirty room" > > situation here, to use your metaphor. > > I think you are right. > -- João Távora