Alex ter Weele writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Alex ter Weele writes: >> >>> From 2774cc719fa132ed8fd34a1d71f2c5a0f8697645 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Alex ter Weele >>> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 21:35:14 -0500 >>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: agda: Compile .agda files. >>> >>> * gnu/packages/agda.scm: (agda)[arguments]: Compile .agda files. >> >> [...] >> >>> + (arguments >>> + `(#:modules ((guix build haskell-build-system) >>> + (guix build utils) >>> + (srfi srfi-26)) >>> + #:phases >>> + (modify-phases %standard-phases >>> + (add-after 'compile 'agda-compile >>> + (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys) >>> + (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")) >>> + (agda-compiler (string-append out "/bin/agda")) >>> + (agda-files-path (string-append >>> + out >>> + "/share/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.0.2/Agda-" >> >> This is unfortunate, since it hard-codes both architecture and GHC >> version. Can you think of another method to find these files? >> >> Are there ".agda" files elsewhere under "/share"? Could the find-files >> invokation below simply search "out/share", for example? >> > > That works! > >>> + ,version >>> + "/lib/prim/Agda/")) >>> + (agda-files (append >>> + (find-files agda-files-path "\\.agda$") >>> + (find-files (string-append >>> + agda-files-path >>> + "Builtin") >>> + "\\.agda$")))) >> >> (find-files ...) recurses through subdirectories, are you sure adding an >> extra pass for "Builtin/*.agda" makes a difference here? >> > > Removed. > >>> + (for-each (cut invoke agda-compiler <>) agda-files) >>> + #t)))))) >>> (home-page "http://wiki.portal.chalmers.se/agda/") >> >> Otherwise LGTM. >> >> [...] >> >>> From ff441cb0b500d247de9a54c3212f80b4fcfaf04f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Alex ter Weele >>> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 10:57:35 -0500 >>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add emacs-agda2-mode >>> >>> * gnu/packages/agda.scm (emacs-agda2-mode): New variable. >> >> LGTM! > > I found a few potential issues with it. The variable and package names > were mismatched, the inputs were inherited, and the home page was > misspelled. Corrected in the following patch series. > > Thanks for the review! Thanks for catching my review mistake! All LGTM.