8dd35a0e2 is good


2017-12-02 21:12 GMT+01:00 Gábor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com>:

> It seems, that we have a breakage in current core-updates. m4, gettext,
> and at least a few other packages fail to build.
>
> We had a discussion about that on irc, here are the important points:
>
> [09:34:53] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567250> * g_bor
> has joined #guix
> [09:34:58] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567251> <g_bor> Hello
> guix!
> [09:37:37] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567253> <g_bor> I
> just tried to build something no core-updates and m4 and python-boot0 does
> not build, I get a message that a decoding error occured in exception
> dispatcher. It seem like it's locale related, I'm on hu_HU.UTF-8
> [09:38:03] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567254> <g_bor> I'm
> tring this now on master to see if the problem persists.
> [09:38:10] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567255> <g_bor> Anyone
> seen that?
> [16:46:05] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567672> <civodul> mb[m]1:
> you were right about the failing installation tests
> [16:46:16] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567673> <civodul> it
> did work a couple of days ago though, so there's hope
> [16:47:16] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567675> <mb[m]1> civodul:
> Any idea what caused it? Haven't been paying attention lately.
> [16:47:24] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567676> *
> kristofer has joined #guix
> [16:53:03] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567677> <civodul> mb[m]1:
> no idea yet, let's see
> [16:54:11] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567678> <mb[m]1> I
> don't understand why core-updates is failing. I've bisected glibc down to
> the first two commits on the 2.26 branch, and also tried reverting the
> libatomic-ops update.
> [16:54:35] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567679> <civodul> how's
> it failing?
> [16:54:41] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567680> <civodul> well
> maybe i should focus on one thing at a time :-)
> [16:54:46] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567681> <mb[m]1> So
> the culprit is likely one of these: https://sourceware.org/
> git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=665ce88d68fd13c5c...
> <https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=665ce88d68fd13c5c4cbaf2808434c618745137c>
>  and https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=
> dc258ce62ae0bbb45...
> <https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=dc258ce62ae0bbb456c6a855dbb6b384ecf7e988>
> [16:55:27] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567682> *
> jonsger has joined #guix
> [16:55:31] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567683> <mb[m]1> civodul:
> "m4" and a few others fail like this: https://paste.debian.net/998765/
> [16:55:36] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567684> <civodul> you'll
> find yourself being a libc hacker without noticing
> [16:55:41] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567685> <mb[m]1>
> Hehe.
> [16:56:24] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567686> <civodul> in
> this case it's the 'configure' file that leads to a decoding error
> [16:56:28] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567687> <civodul> could
> you check its encoding?
>
> [16:57:52] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567689> <mb[m]1> I
> don't currently have the files. But I had built much further before the
> glibc update (with the C++ fixes only).
> [16:57:56] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567690> *
> jonsger has joined #guix
> [17:00:55] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567693> <mb[m]1> I
> unpacked the m4 source and ran `file` on it:
> [17:00:57] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567694> <mb[m]1> configure:
> POSIX shell script, UTF-8 Unicode text executable
> [17:01:24] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567695> <civodul> so
> it could be an issue with iconv in the new libc
> [17:06:59] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567697> *
> ryanwatkins has joined #guix
> [17:11:08] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567699> <g_bor>
> hello!
> [17:11:18] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567700> <g_bor> Anyone
> seen this?
> [17:11:30] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567701> <g_bor> It's
> on core-updates:
> [17:11:51] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567702> <g_bor> starting
> phase `patch-usr-bin-file' Backtrace: 16 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/4jf0jcpvjn6r2warav5xmxhmddf?")
> In ice-9/eval.scm: 191:35 15 (_ _) In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 863:16 14 (every1
> #<procedure 9b0b40 at /gnu/store/yifqwmdxc4pmd?> ?) In /gnu/store/
> yifqwmdxc4pmdpm73diq03lqkprnrizn-module-import/guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm:
> 711:27 13 (_ _) 171:4 12 (patch-usr-bin-file #:native-inputs _ #:inputs _ #
> _) In srfi/srfi
> [17:13:38] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567703> <civodul> g_bor:
> mb[m]1 was just reporting the exact same issue :-)
> [17:13:45] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567704> <mb[m]1> g_bor:
> Yes, I'm currently trying to track it down.
> [17:14:36] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567705> <g_bor> I've
> also seen it on python-boot0, slightly different message.
> [17:14:55] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567706> <g_bor> Can
> this be locale related?
> [17:15:05] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567707> <g_bor> I
> have hu_HU.utf8 here.
> [17:16:04] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567708> *
> civodul has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
> [17:17:26] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567709> <g_bor> mb[m]1:
> can I be of assistance?
> [17:18:19] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567711> *
> civodul has joined #guix
> [17:18:42] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567713> <mb[m]1> g_bor:
> The failure happens in the build container which uses a fixed locale (C?).
> [17:19:17] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567714> <g_bor> Ok,
> then it's not that.
> [17:19:38] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567715> <g_bor> It
> just seemd to be some character conversion error...
> [17:20:08] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567716> <g_bor> Maybe
> some invalid charaters leaked in somehow...
> [17:20:15] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567717> <g_bor> Wait
> a sec...
> [17:22:51] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567719> <g_bor> It
> seems, that a lot of packages are broken.
> [17:23:01] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567720> <g_bor> I
> laso got that for gettext.
> [17:26:26] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567721> *
> xkapastel has joined #guix
> [17:30:38] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567723> <mb[m]1> Can
> it be ncurses related?
> [17:31:12] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567724> <g_bor> Might
> be...
> [17:31:21] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567725> <g_bor> did
> not checked that.
> [17:32:01] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567726> <mb[m]1> g_bor:
> Can you see if reverting 667082d59104d4b964dce878f5e8c0f8ad1be958 makes a
> difference?
> [17:32:24] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567727> <g_bor> Ok,
> i will try that
> [17:36:36] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567731> <g_bor> Do
> we know about what was the last time it was working?
> [17:36:58] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567732> <g_bor> We
> could do a git bisect on core-updates?
> [17:37:13] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567733> <g_bor> Do
> we have a good commit to start from?
> [18:40] <g_bor> Ok, now it's building.
> [18:40] <g_bor> I think this will take a time...
> [18:41] <g_bor> (guile does take some time :) )
> [18:42] <g_bor> I'm trying to help to switch the default icedtea to
> icedtea-8, and we'd like to that on core-updates...
> [18:43] <g_bor> I've just written on the mailing list, that it would be
> nice if we could have substitutes for the core-updates gnu-build-system.
> [18:43] <g_bor> That could speed things like this up.
> [18:50] <efraim> mb[m]1: just popped in for a second, core-updates is
> failing on aarch64 also
> [18:50] <efraim> civodul too ^
> [18:52] <g_bor> Oh, well.
> [18:52] <g_bor> Do we have a bug report on that already?
> [18:53] <g_bor> Now I'm trying what mb[m]1 suggested, by reverting the
> ncurses commit.
> [18:54] <g_bor> It might be easier to track related information in a
> bug...
>
> [20:52] <g_bor> reverting 667082d59104d4b964dce878f5e8c0f8ad1be958 did
> not help
>
> Does anyone know of a last working commit id?
>
> I'm trying to seen if it's working after last merge of master, but if
> someone knows a later point to start investigating the issue would help.
>
> It would also help, if someone with a more powerful computer could help,
> as building on mine is very slow.
>
>