On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Curt McDowell <csm@purestorage.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm running idutils 4.6 on Ubuntu 14.04 to index a large source base that is
>> on an NFS-mounted filesystem that uses 64-bit inodes. mkid incorrectly
>> issues many warnings such as the following:
>>
>> /home/csm/src/idutils-4.6/src/mkid: warning:
>> `/df-csm/ir-csm7/platform/dot/ir/component/si5338/si5338.py' and
>> `/df-csm/ir-csm7/hardware/perf/CTRL_systemC/src/demux.hpp' are the same
>> file, but yield different scans!
>>
>> It turns out these inodes are equal in the lower 32 bits, but are not equal.
>>
>> % ls -li /df-csm/ir-csm7/platform/dot/ir/component/si5338/si5338.py
>> /df-csm/ir-csm7/hardware/perf/CTRL_systemC/src/demux.hpp
>> 33776997256654722 -rwxr-xr-x 1 csm staff  3290 May 22 22:03
>> /df-csm/ir-csm7/hardware/perf/CTRL_systemC/src/demux.hpp
>> 63050394834562946 -rw-r--r-- 1 csm staff 28973 May 22 22:03
>> /df-csm/ir-csm7/platform/dot/ir/component/si5338/si5338.py
>>
>> The inode numbers in hex are 780000030FEF82 and E00000030FEF82,
>> respectively.
>>
>> I believe the bug is that the inode hash functions should account for the
>> size of the di_ino field in case it is 8 bytes wide, rather than assuming
>> they are always 4 bytes:
>>
>> /****************************************************************************/
>> /* Hash stuff for `struct dev_ino'.  */
>>
>> static unsigned long
>> dev_ino_hash_1 (void const *key)
>> {
>>   unsigned long result = 0;
>>   INTEGER_HASH_1 (((struct dev_ino const *) key)->di_dev, result);
>>   INTEGER_HASH_1 (((struct dev_ino const *) key)->di_ino, result);
>>   return result;
>> }
>>
>> static unsigned long
>> dev_ino_hash_2 (void const *key)
>> {
>>   unsigned long result = 0;
>>   INTEGER_HASH_2 (((struct dev_ino const *) key)->di_dev, result);
>>   INTEGER_HASH_2 (((struct dev_ino const *) key)->di_ino, result);
>>   return result;
>> }
>>
>> As an unrelated issue, in order to get idutils 4.6 to compile on Ubuntu
>> 14.0.4 I had to edit lib/stdio.h and change "#if 1" to "#if 0" for the
>> section that deals with the "gets" function (libc 2.19-0ubuntu6.13).
>
> Thank you for the report.
> That is definitely a bug -- and it is over two decades old!
> I will fix this shortly, and will soon make a test release.

It wasn't as prompt as I would have liked, but here's a patch.
I'll make a snapshot today and post separately to the bug-idutils list.