[Re-CCing the bug] On 24/06/17 15:20, Gábor Boskovits wrote: > Ok, thanks. That is also what I thought. Then this patch is fine by me. > > 2017. jún. 24. 15:18 ezt írta ("Tobias Geerinckx-Rice" >): > > miniLZO isn't a stand-alone library but a subset of LZO specifically > meant to be bundled with other software. It's also GPL2+, so it should > be fine. So configure.ac also allows linking to the full library, instead of inlining the mini version. I guess I wasn't expecting that level of flexibility. In that case, I think we should use our ‘lzo’ package instead. Adding it as an input seems to suffice, no configure flags necessary. Sorry to change my mind on you! :-) Kind regards, T G-R