Hey, It's been a while since I looked at this, but I think it's still relevant. As a reminder, currently the search paths for the Ruby packages in Guix are a bit off [1], which makes it difficult to use Ruby gems with different versions of Ruby. Rubygems by default installs gems to directories specific to the version of Ruby, and this can be helpful when managing multiple versions of Ruby and different sets of gem packages in a shared directory, but with Guix, this isn't necessary, as the store can be used. Ruby/Rubygems supports installing gems in to a vendor directory, which is for gems installed by the package system [2]. While Guix blurs the lines between the "package system" and the "user", using this vendor directory might come in useful. I've attached an updated patch, and successfully built every Ruby package [3], as well as all of the packages that were changed in the patch. The only failure was ruby-pg, which failed to build before this patch. Ideally when using specific versions of ruby, any gems that need to be build with that version of ruby, would be. While this change doesn't do that, it does simplify the search paths of ruby packages and the packages for ruby gems. Reading the bug report again, I think there was nearly consensus about merging this, but I wanted to check if anyone has any comments or experience with Ruby/Rubygems before merging this? Thanks, Chris 1: scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (gnu packages) (guix packages) (guix search-paths) (ice-9 match)) scheme@(guile-user)> (map (lambda (ruby) (cons (package-version ruby) (match (package-native-search-paths ruby) (() #f) ((($ _ files)) files)))) (find-packages-by-name "ruby")) $1 = (("2.4.3" "lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0") ("2.4.2" "lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0") ("2.3.6" "lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0") ("2.2.9" "lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0") ("2.1.10" "lib/ruby/gems/2.1.0") ("1.8.7-p374" . #f)) 2: http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_8_7/NEWS 3: guix build --keep-going $(guix package -s ruby- | recsel -P name | tr '\n' ' ')