On 7/7/25 10:34, Sean Whitton wrote:
> That's okay, I think the only thing is to check that the backend
> implements file-name-changes using vc-find-backend-function.  Then so
> long as the general approach makes sense and works for Git it's fine.

I've updated the patch based on your suggestions. You're right, 
`vc-annotate' is indeed a better place for this change.

>> Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> writes:
>>
>>> On 05/07/2025 19:42, Sean Whitton wrote:
>>> I think (?) the file name might have changed in some later revision - so
>>> it won't be returned by vc-git-file-name-changes for that specific REV,
>>> but still might not match the current name.
>>
>> I'm not sure.
> 
> Seems like this needs to be investigated before we can proceed.
I've tested various scenarios and haven't encountered any issues with 
the current implementation. It would be great if you could test the 
change as well, in case there are edge cases I missed.