John Darrington writes: > * gnu/packages/image-processing.scm: New file. > * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it. Judging from the description of the software, it seems like this could fit in gnu/packages/image.scm. > --- > gnu/local.mk | 1 + > gnu/packages/image-processing.scm | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 gnu/packages/image-processing.scm > > diff --git a/gnu/local.mk b/gnu/local.mk > index c1b076a..15325d3 100644 > --- a/gnu/local.mk > +++ b/gnu/local.mk > @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES = \ > %D%/packages/idris.scm \ > %D%/packages/idutils.scm \ > %D%/packages/image.scm \ > + %D%/packages/image-processing.scm \ > %D%/packages/image-viewers.scm \ > %D%/packages/imagemagick.scm \ > %D%/packages/indent.scm \ > diff --git a/gnu/packages/image-processing.scm b/gnu/packages/image-processing.scm > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..e1ad93e > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gnu/packages/image-processing.scm > @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ > +;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU > +;;; Copyright © 2017 John Darrington > +;;; > +;;; This file is part of GNU Guix. > +;;; > +;;; GNU Guix is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it > +;;; under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > +;;; the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or (at > +;;; your option) any later version. > +;;; > +;;; GNU Guix is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but > +;;; WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > +;;; MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > +;;; GNU General Public License for more details. > +;;; > +;;; You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > +;;; along with GNU Guix. If not, see . > + > +(define-module (gnu packages image-processing) > + #:use-module ((guix licenses) #:prefix license:) > + #:use-module (guix packages) > + #:use-module (guix utils) > + #:use-module (guix download) > + #:use-module (guix build-system gnu) > + #:use-module (gnu packages) > + #:use-module (gnu packages compression) > + #:use-module (gnu packages documentation) > + #:use-module (gnu packages image) > + #:use-module (gnu packages perl)) > + > +(define-public dcmtk > + (package > + (name "dcmtk") > + (version "3.6.0") > + (source (origin > + (method url-fetch) > + (uri > + (string-append > + "ftp://dicom.offis.de/pub/dicom/offis/software/dcmtk/dcmtk" > + (string-fold (lambda (x prev) > + (if (eq? x #\.) prev > + (string-append prev (string x)))) > + "" version) The same effect is more directly (IMO) accomplished using the following: (string-join (string-split version #\.) "") > + "/dcmtk-" > + version ".tar.gz")) > + (sha256 > + (base32 > + "0fnkbq0nz8658svdn1xnjrv8qm618gln1q8ykwszmb9225q0kifg")))) > + (build-system gnu-build-system) > + (arguments `(#:parallel-build? #f ; Broken makefile > + #:tests? #f ; There are no tests > + #:make-flags `("CXXFLAGS=-fpermissive -fPIC" > + "CFLAGS=-fPIC") > + #:phases > + (modify-phases %standard-phases > + (replace 'install > + (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys) > + (zero? (system* "make" > + "install-all"))))))) > + (inputs `(("libtiff" ,libtiff) > + ("libpng" ,libpng) > + ("doxygen" ,doxygen) > + ("zlib" ,zlib))) > + (native-inputs `(("perl" ,perl))) > + (synopsis "Libraries and programs implementing large parts the DICOM standard") > + (description "DCMTK is a collection of libraries and applications Nitpicking again: why the double space between "description" and the double quote? > +implementing large parts the DICOM standard. It includes software for > +examining, constructing and converting DICOM image files, handling offline > +media, sending and receiving images over a network connection, as well as > +demonstrative image storage and worklist servers.") > + (home-page "http://dcmtk.org") > + (license (license:fsf-free > + "file://COPYRIGHT" > + "A union of the Apache 2.0 licence and various non-copyleft > +licences similar to the Modified BSD licence.")))) Also, the linter says that this package vulnerable to CVE-2015-8979. Supposedly this* upstream patch fixes it. Could you see if that fix works for this package? * https://github.com/commontk/DCMTK/commit/1b6bb76 Other than the above, LGTM.