On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:12:40PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
     On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 08:23:35AM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
     > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 04:42:59PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
     >      
     >      Judging from the description of the software, it seems like this could
     >      fit in gnu/packages/image.scm.
     >      Also, the linter says that this package vulnerable to
     >      CVE-2015-8979. Supposedly this* upstream patch fixes it. Could you see
     >      if that fix works for this package?
     >      
     >      * https://github.com/commontk/DCMTK/commit/1b6bb76
     >      
     > 
     > Unfortunately this patch doesn't go in.  It seems that as well as fixing this
     > vulnerability it also makes some unrelated changes.  Furthermore, it depends
     > on a whole lot of other patches which are not in this release.
     > 
     > Do we have a procedure on what to do in cases like this?
     
     We could see what other distros have done. Maybe they have a simpler
     patch we could copy. 

I did try that too.  Unfortunately the Debian patch seems to have combined some non-CVE
fixes into the same patch AND that patch is dependendent upon some other unrelated patches.

I probably could with a lot of trial and error make a patch which works, but IMO that
defeats the purpose.  I security patch should be A) as simple as possible; B) not 
contain any unrelated fixes; and C) prepared by someone who knows what she is doing.

     Or, we could try building from an arbitrary Git commit.

Yes. That is the other option -  I think it might be a what we'll have to do.

J'



-- 
Avoid eavesdropping.  Send strong encrypted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.