Mekeor, sorry for the delay in reviewing this patch. I'm afraid Ricardo forgot this. Patches are becoming to many and reviewers are not increasing that much, as far as I understand But that's no problem, we can start reviewing on our own ;-) 2017-03-01 20:23 GMT+01:00 Mekeor Melire : > > +(define-public libmesode > + (package > + (name "libmesode") > + (version "0.9.1") > + (source (origin > + (method url-fetch) > + (uri (string-append "https://github.com/boothj5/ > libmesode/archive/" > + version ".tar.gz") > I think there is a missing closing paren at the end of the "uri" field descriptor. > + (sha256 > + (base32 > + "0iaj56fkd5bjvqpvq3324ni895rmbj > 1akbfqipjydnghfwaym4z6")))) > Here, you could use a line like this (file-name (string-append name "-" version "-checkout")) Otherwise the linter complains that this is missing. Like this gnu/packages/messaging.scm:1230:12: libmesode@0.9.1: the source file name should contain the package name > + (build-system gnu-build-system) > + (arguments > + `(#:phases > + (modify-phases %standard-phases > + (add-before 'configure 'bootstrap > + (lambda _ > + (zero? (system* "./bootstrap.sh"))))))) > + (inputs > + `(("expat" ,expat) > + ("openssl" ,openssl))) > + (native-inputs > + `(("autoconf" ,autoconf) > + ("automake" ,automake) > + ("libtool" ,libtool) > + ("pkg-config" ,pkg-config))) > + (synopsis "A simple, lightweight C library for writing XMPP clients") > The linter complains that a synopsis shouldn't start with an article. Like this gnu/packages/messaging.scm:1252:14: libmesode@0.9.1: no article allowed at the beginning of the synopsis > + (description "Libmesode is a fork of libstrophe for use with Profanity > +XMPP Client. In particular, libmesode provides extra TLS functionality > such as > The linter complains that there should be 2 spaces after the dot. Like this gnu/packages/messaging.scm:1253:17: libmesode@0.9.1: sentences in description should be followed by two spaces; possible infraction at 68 > +manual SSL certificate verification.") > + (home-page "https://github.com/boothj5/libmesode") > + (license (list license:gpl3+ license:x11)))) > Further, guix size reports this /gnu/store/50zvxq72sxcnx8vy7h4wijbfyixyhr0f-libmesode-0.9.1 67.8 0.3 0.4% /gnu/store/liib5wid6rx9rkss78spc7wcqzwb1g2k-openssl-1.0.2j 66.9 5.9 8.8% /gnu/store/ppk2n4xi6pzgchcfzl2p48yj7y4jvnjv-expat-2.2.0 61.6 0.6 0.9% /gnu/store/cdi08kw7r6r684w8mk0xq0dkgpjhfpmd-gcc-4.9.4-lib 61.0 22.7 33.5% /gnu/store/iwgi9001dmmihrjg4rqhd6pa6788prjw-glibc-2.24 38.3 36.8 54.3% /gnu/store/rvgmixpmsq5lqr9qflhkm70kg7a4rys2-bash-static-4.4.0 1.4 1.4 2.1% I'm ok with all these lines but the last one: bash static. I don't know what libmesode does, but does a library need bash ? I'd like other reviewers to chime in, here Also I couldn't check whether the build is deteministic because I have already built it and calling "build --rounds=2" again won't reiterate the build process. Please, help There might be more observations, keep in mind that I'm not an expert reviewer. In the meantime I suggest you to take a look at the manual page about submitting patches. That's where I took the bulleted list of checks and suggestions that I made here. So the next time you can do it yourself ! It's here https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Submitting-Patches.html#Submitting-Patches Thanks for working on this ! Ciao