Jim Meyering wrote: > I suspect this won't be the last word in this area, because it feels > like we should be able to adjust DFA's tables so that people using > such locales can retain DFA's efficiency without the bug in the > current implementation. Hi Jim, It is a bug in dfa for period expression in non-UTF8 locales. dfa calculates transition for single byte characters and a multibyte character separately and merge both results. However, if backs to an initial state in transition for single byte characters, we should stop matching single byte characters. Thanks, Norihiro