Andy Wingo writes:

> I agree :)  Thanks for the patch!
>
> The patch goes in a direction that I'm a bit hesitant about though --
> this command-line processing is getting a bit intense.  Would it be
> possible to add a #:cleanup? argument to the spawn-server function
> instead?

I agree that my previous patch makes things more complicated, so I tried
the route you suggested, but...

> My only doubt would be whether all threads unwind when the program
> ends.  (And if they don't, is that a bug?  I am not sure but I would
> guess so; dunno.)

... and it doesn't seem to work for that reason.  The thread never seems
to unwind.  I put a print statement (not in this patch) at the very part
of the out guard but it never seems to run.  Too bad...

So I guess the question is whether or not addressing the thread issue as
a potential bug should be done or applying the previous patch version
which worked but made the command line processing more complex?  Or
something else?