On 29/09/16 08:15, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 09/26/2016 05:53 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
>>> "I don't think we need to fix this for runcon, as it isn't as
>>> sandboxing tool like sandbox, and the loss of job control would likely
>>> be much more noticeable for runcon."
>>
>> Thanks, closing the debbugs bug report.
> 
> FWIW Karel just committed a workaround for su/runuser in util-linux
> using libseccomp:
> 
> https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/commit/8e492501

I think this issue is worth addressing with libseccomp.
That lib is a widely used dependency on SELinux systems
so not a significant dependency to add.
The attached uses libseccomp if available,
and falls back to using setsid() in the edge cases where not.

cheers,
Pádraig