Robert Cochran writes: > Nothing has come to mind for a method to fix it without breaking other > things. Perhaps the solution is obvious for someone else? Suggestions > would be nice if you have them. Not entirely sure if this is correct, but the patch below seems to fix it for me, without breaking any of the previously mentioned scenarios. I find the fact that end-of-defun goes to the line following the closing paren a bit dubious, though I guess since it's been that way so long, we can hardly change it now.