npostavs@users.sourceforge.net writes:

> Yes, ert binds `debugger' in order to get full backtrace information
> when there is an error.  This means it won't see errors caught by
> condition-case.  That's good when it ignores errors caught by test code
> using condition-case, but does give rise to problems.  There is some
> relevant discussion in Bugs #11218 and #24617.
>
> Espcially the suggestion in #24617 of using `signal-hook-function' to
> record error info instead of using `debugger', I think doing this could
> simplify things a lot.  It is definitely going to require messing around
> with ert's internals though...

Thanks for the info. I may have discovered a workaround, but I'm not
sure if there's any negative side-effects. All the tests pass, though.

What do you think of it? It's obviously not ideal, but I think it at
least fixes the issues at hand.