On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 23:35:22 +0900
Norihiro Tanaka <noritnk@kcn.ne.jp> wrote:

> I updated the patch due to change in bug#21486, and added a patch
> including a minor change.

I wrote third patch.  After first patch, we do not have to separate next
state by context, transit_state() never treats a eol-byte as current
context.  So remove it.