On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> wrote:
> IMO, there's no too much need to exhaustively test `json-encode', 
> aside from one encode test (with any value), one decode test, and 
> maybe one try-to-encode-something-unusual-and-end-up-with-an-error 
> test.
> 
> Testing all contents of json-readtable would seem excessive to me. 
> But hey, if we miscalculate, we can add more tests as we fix 
> regressions, later.

Alright!

I've attached an updated patch.

-- Simen