On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:24:26 +0000
> > From: Pip Cet <pipcet@gmail.com>
> > Cc: 21380@debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> >     > Further investigation indicates that
> >     > window-configuration-change-hook was called in the middle of
> concat:
> >
> >     Did you understand how this fact is related to the segfault?
> >
> >
> > I _think_ I do.
> >
> > 1. concat called with args[0] == Vtimer_list
> > 2. concat stores result_len (=4)
> > 3. concat calls make_list (4)
> > 4. make_list interrupted by QUIT
> > 5. see stack trace
> > 6. window-configuration-change-hook modifies Vtimer_list, which now has
> length
> > 5
> > 7. control returns to concat
> > 8. concat tries to write 5 elements into a 4-element list, which causes
> the
> > segfault because `tail' is unexpectedly NULL.
> >
> > Does that make sense to you?
>
> It does, but there's one additional factor that was supposed to
> prevent such problems: the first thing timer_check does is copy
> Vtimer_list to a local variable; then it works on that copy.  So
> whatever happens in the meantime to Vtimer_list should not have
> affected concat, because concat is called on a copy.
>

I'm not sure I understand. This issue is happening while the temporary copy
is being created, not afterwards, IIUC.