Can someone please review this? On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 11:06 AM Kaushal wrote: > Hi, > > This was posted on the emacs-devel list a while back and it was suggested > that this be posted on bug-gnu-emacs. > > The aim of this patch is that opening M-x woman buffers be controlled > using display-buffer-alist. Using display-buffer function instead of > switch-to-buffer function will allow the user to control how they want to > open the WoMan buffers (same window, other window, popup, etc) > > The patch is below: > > Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:00:39 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] Allow display-buffer-alist to control woman bufs > > --- > lisp/woman.el | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lisp/woman.el b/lisp/woman.el > index 75c3d2e..e903caa 100644 > --- a/lisp/woman.el > +++ b/lisp/woman.el > @@ -1651,7 +1651,7 @@ Do not call directly!" > (setq woman-frame (make-frame))))) > (set-buffer (get-buffer-create bufname)) > (condition-case nil > - (switch-to-buffer (current-buffer)) > + (display-buffer (current-buffer)) > (error (pop-to-buffer (current-buffer)))) > (buffer-disable-undo) > (setq buffer-read-only nil) > @@ -2061,14 +2061,14 @@ alist in `woman-buffer-alist' and return nil." > (if (zerop woman-buffer-number) > (let ((buffer (get-buffer (cdr (car woman-buffer-alist))))) > (if buffer > - (switch-to-buffer buffer) > + (display-buffer buffer) > ;; Delete alist element: > (setq woman-buffer-alist (cdr woman-buffer-alist)) > nil)) > (let* ((prev-ptr (nthcdr (1- woman-buffer-number) woman-buffer-alist)) > (buffer (get-buffer (cdr (car (cdr prev-ptr)))))) > (if buffer > - (switch-to-buffer buffer) > + (display-buffer buffer) > ;; Delete alist element: > (setcdr prev-ptr (cdr (cdr prev-ptr))) > (if (>= woman-buffer-number (length woman-buffer-alist)) > -- > 1.9.2 > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:03 PM Michael Heerdegen < > michael_heerdegen@web.de> wrote: > >> Hi Kaushal, >> >> > I was trying to make the WoMan buffers open as I intend to using >> > display-buffer-alist. But that was not working. >> >> I guess your message got lost here, better make a bug report, and >> better include a patch than the whole changed code. >> >> > can that change be made in the master? >> >> I think it would be an improvement. >> >> The very same applies to eww: >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> (defun eww-setup-buffer () >> (switch-to-buffer (get-buffer-create "*eww*")) ; <----- >> (let ((inhibit-read-only t)) >> (remove-overlays) >> (erase-buffer)) >> (unless (eq major-mode 'eww-mode) >> (eww-mode))) >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> Maybe there are more cases. It's surely worth discussing. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Michael. >> >