Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> writes:

> Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
>> is it ok for now to keep these calls to sigprocmask and fix all the
>> other issues you reported (until the ls.c code is Gnulib-ized)?
>
> Sure, if removing sigprocmask calls is merely an efficiency thing.
> (It may be that the cost of the sigprocmask calls is not significant,
> so we can leave them in.)  Correctness is the bigger problem here.

I've attached a new version where I leave sigprocmask when colors are
used on a tty.

Regards,
Giuseppe