Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > >> Reading this bug report, there seemed to be general agreement that Emacs >> should have `list*', and that `cl-list*' should be an alias for it, but >> these patches were not applied. >> >> I can't find your name in the Emacs copyright assignment file -- would >> you be willing to sign a copyright assignment to the FSF? > > I asked that three years ago, when the patch was already two years old, > so I'm guessing that this is not going to happen, so I'm closing this > bug report. Oh, this reminds me I had started writing a patch for this. I used the name cons* instead of list* though, I always found it more logical: cons* is cons repeated, just like let* is let repeated. Let me dust it off: