> Regardless of where the vertical line is, it is now almost impossible to > get the <=> handle to appear at all when approaching the vertical line > from the left -- I get it once in about fifty attempts. When approaching > the vertical line from the right, the <=> handle appears normally (and > it now appears normally when the vertical line is all the way to the > left as well). If you can apply the patch I posted earlier (and I attach here again) you could try the following snippet with emacs -Q: (let ((i 200) (window-on-left (selected-window)) (window-on-right (split-window-right)) (lhits 0) (rhits 0)) (tooltip-mode -1) (scroll-bar-mode -1) (set-mouse-pixel-position (selected-frame) i 200) (while (car (setq position (cdr (mouse-pixel-position)))) (let ((coordinates (coordinates-in-window-p position window-on-left t))) (when (eq coordinates 'vertical-line) (setq lhits (1+ lhits)))) (let ((coordinates (coordinates-in-window-p position window-on-right t))) (when (eq coordinates 'vertical-line) (setq rhits (1+ rhits)))) (sit-for 0.001) (set-mouse-pixel-position (selected-frame) (setq i (1+ i)) 200)) (cons lhits rhits)) Evaluating this returns (8 . 0) here, the cdr of which amounts to the width of one character on my frame. So here I have an 8 pixel-wide corridor entirely in the left window where I am "on the vertical line" (which occupies virtually the 7 right pixels of the right fringe of the window on the left). Evaluating (let ((i 600) (window-on-left (selected-window)) (window-on-right (split-window-right)) (lhits 0) (rhits 0)) (tooltip-mode -1) (scroll-bar-mode -1) (set-mouse-pixel-position (selected-frame) i 200) (while (car (setq position (cdr (mouse-pixel-position)))) (let ((coordinates (coordinates-in-window-p position window-on-left t))) (when (eq coordinates 'vertical-line) (setq lhits (1+ lhits)))) (let ((coordinates (coordinates-in-window-p position window-on-right t))) (when (eq coordinates 'vertical-line) (setq rhits (1+ rhits)))) (sit-for 0.001) (set-mouse-pixel-position (selected-frame) (setq i (1- i)) 200)) (cons lhits rhits)) gets me the same results. What do you get? You might have to change the initial values of `i' to "be in the frame" accordingly. martin