Ok finally got to it. Made 3 builds from the 194-dfd1d tarball: mingw with posix and threads, without posix and threads and linux with posix and threads. All three still have problems compiling the scheme code. All three have problems with scan-api and two of them with popen. All 3 build logs attached. Regards Jan Schukat On 03/13/2013 10:30 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon 11 Mar 2013 10:30, shookie@email.de writes: > >> GUILEC scripts/autofrisk.go >> Backtrace: >> In ice-9/psyntax.scm: >> 1101: 19 [expand-top-sequence ((define (unglob pattern) (let # #))) () ...] >> 1259: 18 [#] >> 1605: 17 [expand-simple-lambda (# . #) () (()) ...] >> 1509: 16 [parse (((# #) . #(syntax-object # # #))) () () () () () ()] >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >> 627: 15 [map # ((# . #))] >> In ice-9/psyntax.scm: >> 2114: 14 [expand-let (let # #) (# #) (# # #) ...] >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >> 627: 13 [map # (#)] >> In ice-9/psyntax.scm: >> 1257: 12 [# (open-input-pipe #)] >> 1186: 11 [syntax-type (open-input-pipe #) (# #) (# # #) ...] >> 579: 10 [syntax-type open-input-pipe (# #) (# # #) ...] >> 292: 9 [get-global-definition-hook open-input-pipe (hygiene scripts autofrisk)] >> In unknown file: >> ?: 8 [module-variable # open-input-pipe] >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >> 2790: 7 [b # open-input-pipe #f] >> 2579: 6 [# # ...] >> 2850: 5 [try-module-autoload (ice-9 popen) #f] >> 2191: 4 [save-module-excursion #] >> 2870: 3 [#] >> In unknown file: >> ?: 2 [primitive-load-path "ice-9\\popen" ...] >> ?: 1 [load-extension "libguile-2.0" "scm_init_popen"] >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >> 106: 0 [# misc-error ...] >> >> ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: In procedure #: >> ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: In procedure dynamic-link: file: "libguile-2.0", message: "The specified module could not be found." >> make[3]: *** [scripts/autofrisk.go] Error 1 > I believe I have fixed this one (and the scan-api one). You will see a > warning when building these two files but that is all. I think at this > point the build should complete. > > New tarball: > > http://wingolog.org/priv/guile-2.0.7.194-dfd1d.tar.gz > > This has been a very long bug report, but productive. Thank you for > following through with these tests, and for checking the above tarball. > > The next step, after moving on to actually build your application ;), is > to get the test suite working. I suspect you will run into some issues. > Will you please run a make check -k, and send the resulting log (if it > has errors) to bug-guile@gnu.org? Thanks :-) Please include > check-guile.log as well. > > I'll close this report, in optimistic hope that these fixes do indeed > allow the build to complete. Let me know how it goes, and happy hacking! > > (Actually while I'm at it: would you also mail the complete set of > patches that you locally apply to your copy? They'll be helpful in > future reports. Thanks!) > > Andy