Hi!

Daniel Hartwig <mandyke@gmail.com> skribis:

> The API seems less clean, and it is not immediately clear
> that uri? is not the top of the URI-like type hierarchy.  The other
> functions only indicate “uri” in their name.  I did not
> wish to introduce parallel “build-uri-reference”, etc. for each of
> these, and did consider adding #:reference? on some to select
> weaker validation.

OK.

So for now, I’d go with this patch, which fixes the bug at hand: